Showing posts with label reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reform. Show all posts
Monday, 18 June 2012
Adoption's changing face
Yesterday the Olympic torch was carried through our town. I don't watch the Olympics but it is very unlikely to see the torch again. Despite the amount of police being in force there was a nice atmosphere and the weather was good.
I am taking each day as it comes. Severe depression comes and go so I try to concentrate on things that will distract me. It has become easier to read these days. I am choosing which battles I am willing to continue standing my stand. It is easier just to 'walk away' from individuals who refuse to educate themselves and attack mothers like me. They simply get pleasure from hurting mothers for no better reason than they can. There are far more important battles to fight and win. Adoption reform is an important battle as the myths and lies need to be exposed.
People will choose to believe adoption happens for good reasons. After all who is going to believe that social workers will lies, disregard doctors, psychiatrist and police reports. They will write that a mother is willing to surrender her baby even when she doesn't. They will hold back information that can help a mother to keep her child or continually move goal posts just to make an adoption possible. Relatives are refused guardianship simply because they may let the parents see the child or refused being allowed to adopt because they are too old or they are Christians. No regard for the mother's wishes are taken into account. It's all about what social workers want and how much funding they can get from the government. Don't get me wrong there are good social workers out there and I have got to know them They do their best to keep families and only keep children in foster care or get them adopted when it's truly in the child's best interests. These social workers work within the system trying to improve it as that is better than losing their jobs and not being able to help families.
These days it is more about educating people that adoption isn't always in the child's best interests and coerced adoptions still happen. These days it isn't so much about clear cut coercion and more about 'persuasion' that open adoption is wonderful. What people don't understand is that open adoption can be closed even if it is written in the paperwork. Also adoptive parents can move or get divorced, there are no guarantees in this world.
Saturday, 10 March 2012
Open letter to David Cameron
Dear Mr Cameron,
I am writing to you due to the media reports that you want
to speed up the adoption process in the UK as mother who was coerced into
surrendering.
My story is that I was a 19 year who worked for the civil
service when I fell pregnant. I wanted
to raise my son so I quiet long enough not to be pressured into having an
abortion by my parents. My reasoning
behind this was that they had pressured my sister into aborting her baby when
she was 15 years. Adoption never crossed
my mind. However when my parents found
out I was pregnant they arranged everything as it was too late for me to have
an abortion. The tactics used by my
parents included:
-
I was told that I would be
an unfit to be a mother.
-
I was told that I would be
inadequate as a mother.
-
I was told that keeping my
baby would be selfish.
-
I was told that I couldn’t
give my son what the adopters could give him.
-
It was stressed to me that
my baby “needed a two-parent family.”
-
It was stressed to me that
the needs of my baby came before my own needs and that I could not fulfill my
baby’s needs.
-
I were told that if I did
not surrender my baby, that my baby would be taken by social services because I
would be sacked because I chose to keep my baby and I would be kicked out (by
my parents) so he would be removed from me because I was homeless.
-
I was told that adoption was
the unselfish option because I was “thinking about what was best for my baby.”
-
That my son would be better
off without me.
The adoption agency’s tactics included:
-
I was told to think only of
the joy that “I would give to a couple who could not have children of their
own.”
-
I was told that if I
changed your mind, you would be disappointing a couple who deserved a baby.
-
I was told that I should
not keep my baby as I would be letting down the adopters down.
-
I was told that I couldn’t
stop the adoption when my baby was about 6 weeks old.
My son was born on the 3rd August and his adoption was
finalized late January 1982. He went
straight to the hospital nursery. The
first time I asked to see him I was taken to him and was allowed to hold
him. After that I was told I was “too
ill to see him”. I received on letter
from his adopters but post reunion I found out they had written three. I believed
what I was told at the time that if I kept my son I would lose my job so
I wouldn’t be able to claim any benefits as I would be choosing my son over my
job. I was also told by my parents they
would make sure I would be homeless and make sure I didn’t get alternative
accommodation. They received three letters which they believed were from me but
I never wrote them any letters. Post
reunion I found out that I couldn’t consent to surrender my son until he was 6
weeks old. I wasn’t told my rights, I
didn’t see any paperwork until I requested to see it post reunion and it is
questionable I signed anything although I don’t believe I did. I was expected to get on with my life, forget
about my son, I would never be allowed to search and he would be too happy with
his adopters to search for me. My son
did start searching for me when he was 18 and found my family. They lied for years telling him they didn’t
know where I was. I found my son when he
was 23 so it blew apart all the lies behind him being adopted.
My son was in foster care for about 5/6 weeks before he went to his
adopters. The adoption agency told me it
was better that I didn’t know where he was in case I agreed to the
adoption. I didn’t know when the
adoption was finalized. I do believe my
signature was forged on the Consent to Relinquish form. I have since tried to see the form but nobody
has told me where it is even though I was told I could see it. I have even been told it has been lost after
I was told I could see the form.
I wasn’t counseled before my son was adopted nor did I know of the
lifelong implications, risks, and emotional consequences of surrender. Nor did I know what options that would enable
you to keep your baby (i.e. financial assistance, temporary foster care, or
filing through court for child support from your baby’s father). Nobody explained my legal rights or that I
would have to sign a Consent to Relinquish form. I was pressured to decide on adoption while
still pregnant although I refused to agree to adoption of my son. I wasn’t given a chance to prove I could care
for my son.
In reality my rights as a mother included:
·
I had the right to see my
baby after he was born.
·
I had the right to hold,
nurse, and care for my baby.
·
I had the right to know
what my legal rights were and to know about the Consent to Relinquish form.
·
I had the right to care for
my baby without feeling pressured to decide about adoption within ANY certain
time period.
·
I had the right to adequate
financial support which would have enabled you to keep and raise your baby if I
had lost my job.
What happened to me was common place for young, unwed mothers post WWII
through to the 1970’s. Mothers started
more support from family members from the 1970’s and they knew what their
rights were to get benefits. However
coerced adoptions didn’t drop dramatically until the 1980’s.
In 2005 Mr Blair made it public knowledge that he wanted to see a rise
in adoptions which I understood to be from foster care. Many people believed this was a good way to
get children who needed a family out of foster care. The reality has been an increase of babies
and young children being removed from their parents as they are easier to adopt
than older children. One abused child is
one too many and one child dying of abuse is one too many. However there has been an increase of forced
adoptions for reasons including the mother is considered by social workers as
too stupid despite having family support, the mother has been in foster care,
depression/post natal depression so may be a danger to her child and false
allegation (which have been proven to be false but adoption still goes ahead.
I do believe that adoption practices from the 1940’s to the present day
should be investigated. I also believe
that mothers who have been coerced into surrendering should have a public
apology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)